Good Lens for Pano work

Welcome to Nodal Ninja Forum

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Good Lens for Pano work

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

  1. Good Lens for Pano work

    #1

    Hi, Ive been having a bit of trouble with getting good sharp panos.Still trying to work out current problems but Im off to the US in May and want to capture a lot of 180 + degree panos. I have a sigma 10-20 but not happy when stiched together.I also used a fa* 28-70mm f/2.8 @ 29mm but a lot of shots to ger what I wasnt.
    Would anyone be able to reccomend a wide angle or fisheye for my Pentax K5. I think the less shot joined safer and better.Its not a trip that I would be able to go back and reshoot.


    John
    Last edited by campdog; 03-14-2011 at 07:20 PM.
  2. #2
    Users Country Flag
    Join Date: Sep 2009
    Location: Los Angeles, CA
    Posts: 344

    Anyone who has seen my work knows that I use a monopod for vacation panoramas. I use a Sigma 8mm f3.5 lens, NN Ultimate R1 at 5 degrees, a monopod and bubble level. 4 around plus a hand held Zenith shot is all that is needed. This very portable rig has allowed me to take panoramas where I would otherwise not have been able to. Practice is the key to good results. I know that just about everyone else has seen this link and the panoramas many times, but they are good examples of what is possible with the Sigma 8mm lens: http://www.dlsphoto.net/Europe2009/Europe2009.htm
  3. #3

    Thanks Dennis. Los Angeles is my first Stop off.
    John
  4. #4

    Very Inspiring work Dennis. Im not sure if thats the type of panos I want to do. Im looking for a wide shot ets say 180 degree for hanging on the wall. Wouls I get that with a 8mm lens or too much distortion.
    John
  5. #5

    Fisheye "distortion" gets corrected in the stitching process and does not make its presence felt in the final panorama. Essentially, the panorama will look the same regardless of the lens used. The image quality and resolution will vary with the lens, of course. Generally, using longer focal length lenses will need more shots to be taken to cover a given angle of view but will deliver more pixels and therefore tend to give better overall quality.

    John
  6. #6
    Users Country Flag
    Join Date: Sep 2009
    Location: Los Angeles, CA
    Posts: 344

    When I am creating a thumbnail of a panorama, I take the final panorama and crop away the bits I do not want. It is easy to chop off the top and bottom of a 360x180 panorama and end up with very nice "flat" panorama. Here is an example of a complete sphere with only the top and bottom removed:



    Before I started trying spherical panoramas, I did cylindrical panoramas with a Nikon Coolpix 880 and a wide angle adapter. The results were very nice. An 8mm lens may be too much distortion. What is it about the Sigma 10-20mm lens that you are not happy with? I did a couple of test spherical panoramas with that lens and were happy with the results. How are you stitching? PTGui handles partial cylindrical panoramas very well.
  7. #7

    Hi Dennis. I have been finding a out of my pano shots were not sharp in places, especially in the background. I thought it was me or the lenses I was using. I have been following the Forums on the Pentax K5 and a lot of people were having trouble with front focusing in low light,Pentax just released a firmware upgrade to try and rectify the problem. I installed the upgrade as well. I decided to run a test yesterday afternoon comparing my K10D any my new K5. I manually spot focused on a spot in my garden @ 10mm on the sigma (manual mode). I used aperture f/11 and started at ISO 100 and increased until the K10 ran out of puff at ISO 2000. I keept the aperture at F/11 and adjusted the shutter speed ot get a correct exposure.I used white balance in (shade).
    Comparing the shots it was easy to see the K5 was much better focus in the foreground but when comparing side by side the K10 was better in the background and the K5 was out of focus or not as sharp.. Also the K5 colour was more of a purple when focusing on a grey area where the K10 was spot on colour matching. I have also noticed purple fringes aroung a lot on my shots in full sunlight and doesnt matter what lens I use. Most of my lenses are from the Pentax FA*2.8 range and the 10-20 in the only non Pentax lens I use.
    I think I need to sort out hte focusing problem before I go any further on Panos. I have been using Photoshop CS4 to stitch my shots together. I normally only go for about a 180 X 90degree wiew.Although I would like to try more at a later date.Thanks for your help so far.

    John
    Last edited by campdog; 03-16-2011 at 02:35 PM.
  8. #8

    Hello John,
    I would also like to know why you are not happy with the Sigma 10-20mm lens as, in theory, it should be ideal for panoramic photography as it has a single point for the Entrance Pupil so that if it is rotated about this point all the rays in the images radiate from the same point.
    http://www.hugha.co.uk/NodalPoint/Index.htm#Results_
+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts