PDA

View Full Version : My NN chimera



1drey
04-14-2008, 02:17 PM
Consists from Manfrotto 300N rotator (sorry, Nick :001_smile:), lower rail from NN3 (light and compact) and vertical assembly from NN5.

The greatest advantage of using Manfrotto 300N (the only piece o panor amic equipment produced by Manfrotto worth to have) is flexibility - I can shoot with Nikkor or Sigma without disassembling rotator and switching from 4 to 6 around on the fly. Also food for shooting semi-pole panos with te monopot mounted on the tripod (on te 300N again).

Who can share their modifications?

Andrey

Yuv
04-14-2008, 03:19 PM
Hi Andrey

I don't own an NN - I've seen Pablo's NN3 and I like it.

Last year, Agnos sponsored the hugin/panotools team on Google's Summer of Code. They sent each and every mentor, and each and every successful student, an MrotatorU from a pre-production series.

<shameless plug count="1">
We're back in business with Google this year too. We should know how many projects we have early next week.
</shameless plug>

The neat thing about the rotator is that it has click-stops at every 30?, making it useful for 4, 6, 12 shots around. I initially intended to upgrade my photo gear this year (I love the new Pentax K20D, with 10-17mm lens) but I ended up buying a 47" LCD TV (FullHD and S-IPS panel) due to be delivered next week and my gadgets budget for the year is gone. I will report on that display on http://panospace.wordpress.com/ when it is setup properly.

<shameless plug count="2">
Web based forums actually don't work well for me. - I just posted this to enter the NN Giveway :-)
</shameless plug>

wow, two shameless plugs in one post, that was worth it :-)

Yuv

Bill Bailey
04-14-2008, 06:06 PM
Consists from Manfrotto 300N rotator (sorry, Nick :001_smile:), lower rail from NN3 (light and compact) and vertical assembly from NN5.

The greatest advantage of using Manfrotto 300N (the only piece o panor amic equipment produced by Manfrotto worth to have) is flexibility - I can shoot with Nikkor or Sigma without disassembling rotator and switching from 4 to 6 around on the fly. Also food for shooting semi-pole panos with te monopot mounted on the tripod (on te 300N again).

Who can share their modifications?

Andrey

Hey Andrey,
Welcome to the forum.
Nick is in the works on something but I will leave him to better explain.
Thanks
Bill

nick fan
04-15-2008, 09:17 AM
Consists from Manfrotto 300N rotator (sorry, Nick :001_smile:), lower rail from NN3 (light and compact) and vertical assembly from NN5.

The greatest advantage of using Manfrotto 300N (the only piece o panor amic equipment produced by Manfrotto worth to have) is flexibility - I can shoot with Nikkor or Sigma without disassembling rotator and switching from 4 to 6 around on the fly. Also food for shooting semi-pole panos with te monopot mounted on the tripod (on te 300N again).

Who can share their modifications?

Andrey


Hi Andrey,
you know what? we will have something better than the 300N! lighter and more precise. We will show early samples soon. BTW, we will have short lower rail for NN5 too.
Bill,
Hmm, we can add the early versions into the giveaway prize too. what do you think?


nick

Bill Bailey
04-15-2008, 09:51 AM
Bill,
Hmm, we can add the early versions into the giveaway prize too. what do you think?
nick

We could have an alternate giveaway or contest. Whatever we come up with we'll mention it here first.
So forum members - stay tuned - you never know what we might do :wink:
Watch that little news box in upper right corner.
Bill

psj
04-18-2008, 08:57 AM
Hi there,

I have been trying to put some bearings onto the rotator to improve the rigidity without gaining significant weight as I just love the compact size of NN3. I have found a good combination but will wait and see Nick's new rotator as my solution will involve some drilling :ohmy: :ohmy:.

Bill Bailey
04-18-2008, 09:29 AM
...my solution will involve some drilling :ohmy: :ohmy:.

drilling? :ohmy:
The new rotator on the MKII uses a new click ball system which replaces the detent pin. This, with improved tension knob, allows for a more positive feel with increased precision and longer wear. If you do decide to modify your NN3 please realize this may void your warranty.
Bill

Terrywoodenpic
04-19-2008, 01:29 PM
Hi there,

I have been trying to put some bearings onto the rotator to improve the rigidity without gaining significant weight as I just love the compact size of NN3. I have found a good combination but will wait and see Nick's new rotator as my solution will involve some drilling :ohmy: :ohmy:.


The NN3ll already has a top bearing; the only friction surface is between the detent disk and the base. this become lightly charged with a small quantity of .
brass dust almost instantly, as it is run in. This acts as a fine lubricant, you would be surprised how much pressure you have then to apply to the adjuster knob to lock it solid.
even with a firm pressure it is still easy to swing.
Compared to the earlier NN3 there is no play or vibration at all. The new ball indent system is also more positive as the ball is free to rotate out of the indents rather than be dragged, resulting in far less wear.

bigwade
04-22-2008, 05:10 PM
Consists from Manfrotto 300N rotator (sorry, Nick :001_smile:), lower rail from NN3 (light and compact) and vertical assembly from NN5.

Hey Andrey, you made the NN4, just what I was asking for........ :-))
NN5 rail is way to long for non batterypack camera's.

Shave a NN5 underrail and mount a upper NN3 is another option and almost the same :-))
Have both but I like my NN3 (weight and size ) on every rotator.....
(Seitz, Feisol etc. )
grtz
Frank

1drey
04-24-2008, 03:07 PM
Shave a NN5 underrail

No way! I dream about the day when D3 will become affordable! :001_smile:

I am eager to see the new rotators designed by Nick - 300N is a bit heavy and bulky.

And Acratech-style levelers, please!

Mauro Contrafatto
04-24-2008, 04:33 PM
And Acratech-style levelers, please!


Hey Andrey,

I've been testing and distributing Acratech levelers, and I would say that they are a little difficult to set up correctly when they are under an heavy camera and lens combinations.
Ez-Levelers are firmer and the correct setting can be do with only one hand.

Furthermore, I believe Acratech levelers are patent pending :wink:

Mauro

nick fan
04-24-2008, 09:47 PM
Hey Andrey,

I've been testing and distributing Acratech levelers, and I would say that they are a little difficult to set up correctly when they are under an heavy camera and lens combinations.
Ez-Levelers are firmer and the correct setting can be do with only one hand.

Furthermore, I believe Acratech levelers are patent pending :wink:

Mauro


there is a big difference between thrumb-wheel leveler and the Acratech's leveler, Manfrotto's, Gitzo's leveling center column. The thrumb-wheel leveler adjust the leveling under the loading of the setup on top. the others do not. upper loading there can be some drift.
The EZ-Leveler has a weight limit of 3kg and this is what we need to improve. We have more advanced and costly design in the optional roatator with built-in leveling base. The weight limit for the improved design is 10kg.


nick

Macro
04-25-2008, 12:19 AM
there is a big difference between thrumb-wheel leveler and the Acratech's leveler, Manfrotto's, Gitzo's leveling center column. The thrumb-wheel leveler adjust the leveling under the loading of the setup on top. the others do not. upper loading there can be some drift.
The EZ-Leveler has a weight limit of 3kg and this is what we need to improve. We have more advanced and costly design in the optional roatator with built-in leveling base. The weight limit for the improved design is 10kg.

nick

Hi Nick,
I considered the EZ-Leveler, but the 3Kg limit seems marginal. Is 3Kg the *breaking* point? Or have you tested with higher loads?

The 10Kg limit for the optional rotator with built-in leveling base sounds better. Will the optional rotator replace the normal NN3/NN5 rotator? Or mount separately under the head? Will it will be much heavier?

David

nick fan
04-25-2008, 08:10 AM
Hi Nick,
I considered the EZ-Leveler, but the 3Kg limit seems marginal. Is 3Kg the *breaking* point? Or have you tested with higher loads?

The 10Kg limit for the optional rotator with built-in leveling base sounds better. Will the optional rotator replace the normal NN3/NN5 rotator? Or mount separately under the head? Will it will be much heavier?

David


over 3kg, there is vibration and instability. so only recommended for NN3 + light gear. It won't break even over 10 kg.
The advanced rotators replace the default rotators. They are heavier and bulkier. The one with leveling base weight similar to default rotator + EZ-L. We can offer some trade-in options for NN3II and NN5 users. The returned rotators can be used for warranty.


nick